Realty Income (O) REIT Analysis

Realty Income Corp. (O) is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) that purchases established retail real estate sites and holds long-term contracts with tenants. Rent collected goes mainly toward distributions to shareholders.

-Seven Year Revenue Growth Rate: 13.6% Dividend Stock Report
-Seven Year FFO/Share Growth Rate: 3.2%
-Seven Year Dividend Growth Rate: 3.9%
-Current Dividend Yield: 4.14%
-Balance Sheet Strength: Stable, Conservative

Realty Income continues to deliver, but the comparatively high valuation has pushed the dividend yield to rather low levels, which reduces the expected long-term rate of return.

Overview

Realty Income Corp. (NYSE: O) is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) that maintains a portfolio of over 3,500 properties in 49 states that are leased to over 200 tenants. The business is rather lean, with a nearly $10 billion market capitalization and under 100 employees.

They focus on acquiring and maintaining properties that already have long-term leases contracted for tenants that they believe operate in healthy industries that absolutely require property for their day-to-day operations. (In comparison, that is, to tenants that may be able to shift some of their business towards the internet, or businesses where their property is a smaller focus of their operations.) Most of their contracts are structured so that the tenant, rather than Realty Income, is responsible for paying property taxes, maintaining the interior, exterior, and land of the property, and for insurance. Realty Income also occasionally trims its portfolio by selling properties that no longer align with their goals.

The ten largest tenants for Realty Income are:
Fed-Ex
L.A. Fitness
Family Dollar
AMC Theatres
Diageo
BJ’s Wholesale
Walgreens
Northern Tier Energy
Super America
Regal Cinema

Over three-quarters of the rental income comes from tenants in Retail, while the remaining quarter is split among Distribution, Office, Agriculture, Manufacturing, and Industrial properties. Currently, over 97% of the properties are occupied.

Revenue

Realty Income Revenue
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

Revenue growth over this period has been a significant 13.6% per year on average, and Funds from Operations have grown at 10.9% per year on average over the same period.

As will be shown by the next chart, much of this growth is fueled by issuing new shares, which dilutes the numbers on a per-share basis. Over the course of this charting period from 2005 to 2012, the REIT went from 83.7 million shares outstanding to 133.4 million shares outstanding. Because the REIT pays out most of its incoming funds as dividends, there is only a modest amount that can be reinvested to grow the property portfolio. Therefore, most of the property acquisitions are paid for by issuing new shares.

Funds From Operations and Dividends

Realty Income Dividend
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

This chart depicts growth on a per-share basis. FFO per share grew by an average of 3.2% per year over this period, while the dividend grew by an average of 3.9%.

The current dividend yield is 4.14%, and Realty Income pays out 85-95% of its FFO as dividends. Realty Income pays out its dividend on a monthly basis.

Approximate historical dividend yield at beginning of each year:

Year Yield
Current 4.14%
2012 5.0%
2011 5.0%
2010 6.3%
2009 7.4%
2008 5.8%
2007 5.3%
2006 6.2%
2005 4.9%

 

As can be seen, Realty Income’s yield is at a low point compared to the recent historical average. The valuation has been pushed higher, resulting in a lower yield.

Balance Sheet

Realty Income maintains an investment grade BBB+ credit rating.

As of the most recent quarter, the REIT has $8.76 billion in assets, $3.62 billion in liabilities, and therefore $5.14 billion in shareholder equity.

Investment Thesis

The thing that stands out about Realty Income is its dedication to shareholders. They brand themselves as “The Monthly Dividend Company”, and the bulk of their website is an atypically user-friendly dedication to educating potential shareholders about their business.

The first thing you may notice if you read their annual report is that the depictions are mostly of shareholders, whereas most annual reports by companies focus on their customers. When you look through the colorful annual reports of most businesses, you’ll generally see depictions of their customers, products, and operations. Indeed, Realty Income does depict some of their properties in their report. But at the forefront of their report are pictures depicting shareholders. There are five pages worth of various pictures of the demographic that they view as their shareholders: typically upper middle class, middle-aged or retired, and generally enjoying life. How a company chooses to market itself, including to its own shareholders, is an expression of that organization’s culture.

Realty Income’s role in a portfolio, over the 4+ decades of operation, has generally been to provide solid current income that keeps up with inflation. Payments come monthly rather than quarterly, and as a REIT the payout ratio is rather high, resulting in a decent current yield of 4+% (though historically higher than that). From a diverse and stable set of properties with long-term contracts, Realty Income seeks to provide good retirement income.

American Realty Capital Trust Acquisition
In the first quarter of 2013, Realty Income completed their acquisition of ARCT for $3.2 billion. This adds 515 properties, leased by 69 tenants in 44 states, to Realty Income’s portfolio, and has resulted in an unusually large dividend increase for the REIT of nearly 25%.

The acquisition also increased the overall occupancy rate of Realty Income, and increased the percentage of investment grade tenants. Currently, about two-thirds of Realty Income’s tenants are investment-grade businesses.

Real Estate Investment Trusts Vs. Directly-Owned Real Estate
Owning property is one of the oldest forms of wealth and investment. Of course, real estate can be owned actively with direct property, or passively through publicly traded REITs.

Owning direct real estate can result in a rate of return that exceeds the historical average of the stock market. Individual real estate markets are generally less efficient than stock markets, less liquid, and require more direct time and attention. When operated skillfully with the proper application of leverage, consistent double-digit returns are possible in many markets. The downside is that, as a hands-on approach, it requires a degree of real estate skill and of course time.

In comparison, owning shares in a REIT is a passive activity, but the returns will generally be lower. The reason for the lower returns is that as an investor, you’re paying a premium for the complete convenience. The book value of Realty Income is less than half of the current market capitalization. If, as a direct real estate investor, you owned shares of Realty Income at direct book value, your dividend yield would be doubled to nearly 10%, with dividend growth that generally keeps up with inflation. You’d be looking at low double-digit returns, which historically is better than the S&P 500.

As a publicly traded entity, the liquidity and passivity of the investment results in a fair price that is higher than book value, and therefore lower returns. Historically this REIT has still outperformed the market, but during most of that period, the valuation was lower and the yield was higher than it currently is.

Risks

Realty Income’s performance comes from the team’s ability to acquire and maintain a highly occupied property portfolio. General economic weakness can decrease their occupancy rates as their tenants struggle.

None of Realty Income’s tenants account for more than 10% of overall rental income, but the top six tenants each account for over 3% of rental income each. Of this, their largest tenant Fed-Ex accounts for 5.5% of rental income.

Conclusion and Valuation

Overall, Realty Income is clearly a well-run operation that has historically served investors well. The nature of property inherently gives them somewhat of an economic moat, and the conservative balance sheet and diversified property portfolio give shareholders some protection against loss. The REIT’s strong focus on shareholders and monthly high-yield dividend can be very attractive to those that seek current income.

The question, though, is whether Realty Income is trading at an attractive valuation. Assuming a constant valuation and dividend payout ratio, long-term returns are approximately equal to sum of dividend yield and dividend growth. For Realty Income, that sum is about 8%.

So, based on the Dividend Discount Model, investors looking for an 8% long-term rate of return, can pay up to $49 for shares of Realty Income, assuming that a 4% dividend growth rate occurs. If only a 3.5% long-term dividend growth rate is expected, this fair value drops to $43 instead.

If investors are looking for 9% annual returns over the long-term, and are expecting 4% dividend growth per year, then the fair value drops to $39.

Therefore, at $52/share, Realty Income is set to deliver shareholders a rate of return in the high 7% range, which is lower than the historical market rate of return, but comparatively solid for those seeking current income. Because the REIT is trading at a historically high valuation with a correspondingly low dividend yield, caution is advised.

Full Disclosure: As of this writing, I have no position in O.
You can see my dividend portfolio here.

Strategic Dividend Newsletter:
Sign up for the free dividend and income investing newsletter to get market updates, attractively priced stock ideas, resources, investing tips, and exclusive investing strategies:

 Dividend Insights Newsletter

We respect your email privacy

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) Dividend Stock Analysis

Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE: CL) is a $56 billion market-cap consumer products company with strong market share in tooth paste and soap.

-Seven Year Revenue Growth Rate: 6.0% Dividend Stock Report
-Seven Year EPS Growth Rate: 11.3%
-Seven Year Dividend Growth Rate: 11.9%
-Current Dividend Yield: 2.25%
-Balance Sheet Strength: Strong

Colgate’s strong product appeal and unusually wide global reach (even among American blue-chips) give investors a lot to like, but the fairly high stock valuation of the company keeps the dividend yield on the lower side and reduces or eliminates any margin of safety.

Overview

Colgate was founded in 1806 in New York as a soap and candle company. Colgate-Palmolive is now a multinational corporation selling oral hygiene products, soaps, and pet nutrition products. The company currently has a market capitalization of over $56 billion.

Business Segments and Divisions

Colgate-Palmolive consists of four business segments: Oral Care, Personal Care, Home Care, and Pet Nutrition.

Oral Care
Oral Care represents 44% of total company sales, which includes their flagship Colgate brand as well as Tom’s of Maine. According to a recent investor presentation, the company has #1 market share in 146 countries, which makes it the world’s leading oral care brand.

Personal Care
The company’s second largest segment is their personal care segment, which accounts for 22% of sales. This segment includes the leading Palmolive soap brand, as well as other brands such as Irish Spring and Speed Stick deodorants. The company claims the #1 market share spot worldwide for liquid hand soap and the #2 spot for bar soaps.

Home Care
The home care segment accounts for 21% of sales, and includes Palmolive dish soap and a set of small and medium brands. The company claims the #1 global spot for dish soap and the #2 spot for fabric conditioners and household cleaners.

Pet Nutrition
Approximately 13% of sales come from the Pet Nutrition segment. Their two big brands here are Science Diet and Prescription Diet, and while they are not the top brands overall, they do claim #1 market share in vet clinics worldwide. The products are sold primarily through veterinarians and specialty pet food stores, and the products are available in 90+ countries.

The company can also be understood as consisting of five geographic business divisions (or, more accurately, four geographic divisions plus Pet Nutrition)

North America
The North American division represents 18% of total company sales.

Latin America
The Latin America division represents 29% of sales.

Europe/South Pacific
The Europe/South Pacific division represents 20% of sales.

Greater Asia/Africa
The Asia/Africa division represents 20% of sales.

Hills Pet Nutrition
The Hills Pet Nutrition segment represents 13% of sales, as previously described. This segment is always grouped separately from their geographic segments.

Ratios

Price to Earnings: 25
Price to Free Cash Flow: 21
Price to Book: 32
Return on Equity: 115%

Revenue

Colgate-Palmolive-Revenue
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

Revenue grew at a very solid 6% per year on average over this period. This revenue growth is what appears to be driving the stock’s high valuation.

Earnings and Dividends

Colgate-Palmolive Dividends
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

The EPS growth rate over this period averaged 11.3% per year, which for a blue-chip stock is quite substantial.

The dividend has increased each year consecutively for decades and currently has a payout ratio of approximately 50%. The rather high valuation of the stock has pushed the yield to a fairly low 2.25%. The dividend growth rate over the last seven years has averaged 11.9% per year.

Approximate historical dividend yield at beginning of each year:

Year Yield
Current 2.25%
2012 2.5%
2011 2.7%
2010 2.2%
2009 2.4%
2008 1.8%
2007 2.0%
2006 2.1%
2005 1.9%

 

Colgate Palmolve’s yield is in line with where it has been over the last several years. Despite being rather highly valued, it is not out of line of where it has historically been valued. The stock has offered solid returns over this period because the stock price has at most times been supported by fundamental outperformance.

How Does Colgate Palmolive Company Spend Its Cash?
Over the last three years, the company reported a sum of approximately $7.6 billion in free cash flow. Over the same period, $3.6 billion was spent on dividends, $5.8 billion was spent on share buybacks, and about $1 billion was spent on net acquisitions. The buybacks have resulted in a continuously shrinking outstanding share count, but the consistently premium stock valuation has minimized the overall value of these buybacks. Over the last seven years, the company has reduced its share count by about 13%.

Balance Sheet

The company has a total debt/equity ratio of approximately 300%, which is rather high. Furthermore, the amount of goodwill on the balance sheet exceeds the shareholder equity. At first glance, this appears to be a heavily leveraged balance sheet.

The total debt/income ratio, however, is only about 220%, which is rather low. The interest coverage ratio is nearly 50x, which is extremely high, and indicative of an unusually strong balance sheet. The company has very high credit ratings.

The reason for the high debt/equity ratio (and along with it the unusually high price/book value and unusually high ROE), is not that the company has a lot of debt, but rather that the company has a comparatively small asset base compared to the revenue and other figures. Colgate Palmolive has only approximately half as much value in non-current assets as their annual revenue, whereas Procter and Gamble, for example, has significantly more reported value in their non-current assets than their annual revenue.

This small reported asset base keeps the company’s shareholder equity very low, which skews the book value, ROE, and debt/equity metrics upwards. Overall, Colgate-Palmolive has a very strong balance sheet.

Investment Thesis

Colgate-Palmolive is in a very strong position compared to its peers. The company’s early move into developing markets has paid dividends, literally and figuratively, because strong performance in those areas is what is driving the company’s substantial revenue growth.

Even among American blue-chip companies, which tend to have significant international exposure, Colgate-Palmolive is an atypically geographically expanded company. Three-quarters of the revenue is generated outside of North America.

In particular, the Latin America and Asia/Africa regions are enjoying rapid expansion. Their sales growth in Latin America has averaged over 12% per year over the last seven years, and their Asia/Africa region has grown at nearly 10% per year over the same period.

The company complements its traditional mass-marketing branding with brands that focus on natural or sustainable aspects to appeal to certain customers. The acquisition of Tom’s of Maine, for example, gives the company a portfolio of products that attempt to be better for the environment and use more natural ingredients.

Oral care products typically carry high profit margins and customer loyalty. The relatively high price per ounce of branded toothpaste, combined with the rather infrequent need to purchase it (and therefore less of a need to compare prices or buy primarily based on price) as well as the unique taste or characteristics of toothpaste that results in frequent repurchase of the same type, gives the Colgate brand quite a bit of strength compared to other product categories of comparable consumer companies.

Risks

Like any company, CL has risks. Their business is fairly recession-resistant, offering high quality basic products, but they face continual risk from foreign exchange rates, commodity costs, and cheaper product alternatives, as well as strong competition from other top brands including from Procter and Gamble, a larger company. The company spends nearly $2 billion per year on advertising to allow them to maintain or grow their market share.

No single customer represents 10% or more of total sales, and no single supplier or packaging material represents a large percentage of total material requirements of the company.

The place where risks for this kind of company would typically manifest themselves are in the profit margins. Increasing advertising costs and increasing commodity costs can squeeze profit margins and reduce income growth.

Conclusion and Valuation

Overall, I view Colgate-Palmolive as a particularly strong dividend-grower, with high and increasing profit margins, solid revenue growth, wide international reach, and reasonable product diversification.

The question, then, is whether the fairly high price is justified. In order to achieve a 9% rate of return over the long-term based on the Dividend Discount Model, the company would have to grow the dividend by an average of nearly 7% per year for the foreseeable future. If a 10% rate of return is desired, the dividend growth rate would have to be closer to 8%. Colgate-Palmolive has maintained this level of EPS and dividend growth historically, but as it grows larger and saturates its core areas, it may be unable to continue that level of growth.

A reasonable scenario for the company is 2-3% core growth, 2-3% inflation (resulting in 4-6% revenue growth), stable profit margins (resulting in 4-6% net income growth to match revenue), 2-4% worth of the market cap being repurchased annually (resulting in 6-10% EPS growth), and a stable dividend payout ratio (resulting in 6-10% dividend growth) puts it in line with the required sustainable dividend growth rates to justify the current price.

There is not a substantial margin of safety built into the stock price, nor is the current yield particularly desirable. I believe total long-term returns should be reasonable for the foreseeable future, but there are likely superior combinations of income and growth available.

Full Disclosure: As of this writing, I have no position in CL.
You can see my dividend portfolio here.

Strategic Dividend Newsletter:
Sign up for the free dividend and income investing newsletter to get market updates, attractively priced stock ideas, resources, investing tips, and exclusive investing strategies:

 Dividend Insights Newsletter

We respect your email privacy

Oneok Inc. (OKE) Valuation Estimate

Oneok Inc. (OKE) is a natural gas utility company that owns the General Partner of Oneok Partners LP (OKS).

-Seven Year EPS Growth Rate: 4.1% Dividend Stock Report
-Seven Year Dividend Growth Rate: 12.6%
-Current Dividend Yield: 2.80%
-Balance Sheet Strength: Investment Grade

Overview

I published a stock report last week on Oneok Partners LP (NYSE: OKS), which is a relatively large natural gas and NGL master limited partnership. In the article, I stated that quantitatively and qualitatively, it appears to be a strong investment with a great combination of yield and growth.

Another way to invest in the assets of that partnership is to invest in Oneok Inc. (NYSE: OKE), which owns the General Partner, 100% Incentive Distribution Rights, and 41.4% of the Limited Partner units, of Oneok Partners LP. Unlike OKS which trades as an MLP, Oneok Inc. trades as a regular dividend stock. This article finishes the Oneok series by taking a look at this general partner.

Business Areas

Oneok Inc. is divided into three main areas: Distribution, Energy Services, and Oneok Partners.

Distribution
Oneok Inc. also owns three natural gas distribution companies that serve customers in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas. Oneok has been in business as an intrastate natural gas distributor in Oklahoma for over 100 years, and now serves three states with over 2 million customers. Oneok’s businesses in Oklahoma and Kansas are the largest in those states, while their Texas distributor is the third largest distributor in Texas.

Energy Services
Oneok makes contracts for supply, transportation, and storage of natural gas to customers across the U.S. This includes leases for storage and transport.

Oneok Partners
Oneok Partners is responsible for most of the growth of Oneok Inc. This MLP is described in more detail here, and primarily deals with natural gas pipelines and NGLs.

Earnings and Dividends

Oneok Dividends
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

For MLPs, earnings per share is not the most accurate way to express profitability of the business due to the very asset-heavy nature of the business. Oneok Inc.’s income statement includes the Oneok Partners income items and then accounts for non-controlling interests. As such, depreciation reductions are substantial for the business and result in a lower net income. A more important chart for profitability appears below in the Thesis section.

For dividends, the company currently pays a 2.8% yield and has an average five-year dividend growth rate of 12.6% per year. The company also buys back a small portion of its shares each year to reduce the outstanding share count ($150 million worth in 2012), and in 2012 purchased additional limited partner units of Oneok Partners LP to increase their total holding.

Approximate historical dividend yield at beginning of each year:

Year Yield
Current 2.8%
2012 3.0%
2011 2.6%
2010 3.5%
2009 5.2%
2008 3.2%
2007 3.0%

 

Balance Sheet

Oneok’s credit rating is BBB/Baa2. As the bulk of the assets for the business are in the MLP, this constitutes a fine credit rating and overall balance sheet strength. As very asset-heavy businesses, energy partnerships utilize substantial leverage in order to get solid returns on capital.

Investment Thesis

Oneok was a run-of-the-mill utility until the years between 2004 and 2006 when it purchased the general partner of Northern Border Partners and renamed it under the Oneok brand. Since then, the company has grown like wildfire because it has been able to use limited partner capital to produce an enormous internal rate of return thanks to the Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs). The company is vertically integrated now, as the interstate pipeline assets that it acquired overlap geographically with their intrastate distribution assets.

Much like Kinder Morgan Inc. and Energy Transfer Equity, Oneok Inc. is a publicly traded general partner of another publicly traded partnership (Oneok Partners LP), and the overall benefits are similar.

Put frankly, a general partner holding of a well-run MLP can be one of the highest-returning investment structures there is, because the whole structure is based on allowing the general partner to get a share of the limited partners’ investment capital, while being given a good incentive to pay the limited partners ever-growing distributions.

The structure of an MLP is that there exists a general partner and limited partners. In the beginning, the general partner gets 2% of the distributions while the limited partners get the other 98%. But as the partnership hits higher per-unit distribution thresholds, the general partner gets a larger share of the distributions, which are called Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs). So the general partner is given a strong incentive to raise the distribution for the limited partners, and over time if they are able to do so, their own rewards are even better, because they get a larger share of the total.

For Oneok, the distribution thresholds are as follows:
-Once OKS hits $0.3025 in distributions per unit per quarter, the general partner gets 15% of amounts distributed above that.
-Once OKS hits $0.3575 in distributions per unit per quarter, the general partner gets 25% of the amounts distributed above that.
-Once OKS hits $0.4675 in distributions per unit per quarter, the general partner gets 50% of the amounts distributed above that.

OKS is currently paying $0.715 in distributions per unit per quarter, so it’s well over the top threshold. As it continues to raise the distribution, the general partner (held by Oneok Inc., OKE) will continue to get this top tier chunk of the cash flows.

This is in addition to the fact that Oneok Inc. holds 41.4% of the limited partner units of OKS, so they also get those limited partner distributions.

Here’s the chart that shows the distributions that Oneok Inc. (OKE) is receiving from Oneok Partners LP (OKS). The period is for 2007-2012, and shows the total broken down into the general partner share and the limited partner share.

Oneok Distributions
(Chart Source: DividendMonk.com)

As can be seen, the general partner portion has grown much more quickly than the limited partner portion. The 2013 estimate for total distributions from Oneok Partners to Oneok Inc. by company management is expected to be another 25% higher than 2012.

In 2007 Oneok Inc. received $145.1 million in limited partner distributions from OKS, which increased to $235.4 million in 2012. This represents an annualized growth rate in limited partner distributions of 10.1%

In comparison, in 2007 Oneok Inc. received $58.5 million in general partner distributions from OKS, which increased to $201.3 million in 2012. This represents an annualized growth rate in general partner distributions of 28%.

The total annual growth rate for distributions received from OKS (meaning both limited and general partner distributions) was around 16.6% per year for this period. This growing stream of incoming cash flow to Oneok Inc. is what fuels the continued dividend growth to their shareholders.

The reason the general partner does so well, if properly managed, is that they get an ever-increasing percentage of the total cash pie, and the overall size of the cash pie grows. So they get a larger share of a larger total, which compounds into a very large internal growth rate. The growth of the total cash pie is fueled by issuing more limited partner units, and if that money is invested well, it can increase the revenue for the overall partnership and increase distributions for all limited partner units. For the 2007-2012 period, OKS increased its outstanding unit count by about 4.5% per year on average, although OKE was itself a major purchaser of these units.

In 2007, Oneok Partners LP paid around $385 million in total distributions. Of this, around 15%, or $58.5 million, went to the general partner share, and the rest went to the limited partners (of which Oneok owns a substantial portion as well).

By 2012, Oneok Partners LP grew as a whole, and paid $761 million in total distributions. Of this, around 26%, or $201.3 million, went to the general partner share, and the rest went to the limited partners (of which Oneok still owned over 40%). During this five year period, the total distributions from the partnership, nearly doubled from around $385 million to around $761 million, the percentage that went to the general partner increased from 15% or so to over 26%, and therefore the distributions to the general partner increased dramatically from $58.5 million to $201.3 million; an almost 3.5x increase.

Even as Oneok Inc. slowly reduces its share count, OKS will likely continue to increase its unit count, which brings in more capital, grows the total cash pie, most likely grows the distributions per unit, and therefore continues to significantly grow the general partner distributions to Oneok Inc.

Risks

The performance of Oneok Inc. is heavily reliant on Oneok Partners LP. While Oneok Inc. does hold its own distribution and energy services segments, the real growth engine for the company over the last 5-6 years has been the LP. If Oneok Partners LP cuts its distribution at any point, not only will Oneok Inc. have its 41.4% limited partner share cut, but they’ll also have their general partner share cut even more dramatically due to the IDR agreement and the aforementioned target distribution thresholds.

More risks are discussed in the OKS analysis.

Conclusion and Valuation

Oneok Partners LP (OKS) is currently in a very strong position of growth with several years of planned investments. Oneok Inc. (OKE) has an even better structural advantage as far as the investment is concerned, because in addition to having exposure to the growing distributions to the limited partners, they enjoy the disproportionate growth of the distributions paid to their solely owned general partner, and they also hold separate assets.

Even a great business, however, can make for a lousy investment if the price isn’t right. As described in the OKS analysis, I believe OKS is at an undervalued price. OKE, however, continues to hit new high water marks of price as it’s fueled by this strong general partner growth.

OKS grew its per-unit limited partner distribution at a 5.5% annual growth rate over the last five years. OKE enjoyed this annual limited partner distribution growth, but also increased its number of limited partner units and enjoyed strong general partner growth. OKE’s total distribution growth from OKS has averaged 16.6% over the last five years. The 2011-2012 growth was over 30%, and management’s predicted 2013-2012 growth is around 25%. Meanwhile, OKE’s stable natural gas distribution income, and their slightly diminishing share count due to repurchases, help per-share growth for OKE investors.

Using a two-stage Dividend Discount Model, if Oneok Inc. grows its dividend by 10% per year on average over the next 10 years followed by 6% thereafter, then with a 10% discount rate (a reasonable target rate of return), the intrinsic fair price will be slightly over $50. This is about a buck less than the current share price, but with this high dividend growth rate, the estimate has a significant margin of error.

Overall, I believe OKE to be approximately fairly valued. It’s not a cheap stock in terms of valuation, but the expected growth does appear to justify the current price.

Generally speaking, I prefer to own publicly traded general partners such as ETE and KMI if given the opportunity. However, if the stock valuations favor the publicly traded limited partnership instead, and if the limited partnership continues to grow its distribution well (as OKS is expected to do, based on its growth plans), then the limited partnership can sometimes be the preferable investment. It’s certainly the preferable investment if you’re after a high current yield. I currently believe OKS is moderately undervalued, while OKE is fairly valued. But OKE as the general partner is in a position to achieve a better rate of return, which may approximately balance out the total returns for investors. I expect that both investments will do well over the long term.

It’s worth pointing out, as usually is the case for publicly traded general and limited partners, that insiders own a much larger portion of Oneok Inc. than Oneok Partners LP. CEO and Chairman John Gibson is reported to own over $30 million worth of Oneok Inc., but under $3 million of Oneok Partners LP.

-Oneok Partners LP appears to be a good choice at an attractive price for a combination of a high distribution yield and moderate distribution growth. As an MLP, investors are responsible for the greater tax complexity during tax season.

-Oneok Inc. appears to be a reasonable choice at a fair valuation, despite the ever-increasing stock price, for a combination of moderate dividend yield and high dividend growth. As a regular stock, investors have a simpler time during tax season.

Full Disclosure: As of this writing, I have no position in OKS or OKE, but they’re on my watch list. I am long ETE and KMI.
You can see my dividend portfolio here.

Strategic Dividend Newsletter:
Sign up for the free dividend and income investing newsletter to get market updates, attractively priced stock ideas, resources, investing tips, and exclusive investing strategies:

 Dividend Insights Newsletter

We respect your email privacy